Supported
Official argument in favor of Proposition 37
“Taxpayer advocates and California’s Legislative Analyst agree: Proposition 37 has no cost to taxpayers.”
Seen in: Official Voter Information Guide, argument in favor of Proposition 37
Verified · Oct 3, 2026The Analyst finds "no direct state or local costs" because payments from homebuyers would repay bond investors, and the Attorney General's summary says the bonds are repaid by homeowners' mortgage payments, "not the State". The Analyst does not use the phrase "no cost to taxpayers". The part of the sentence about taxpayer advocates was not checked.