Check this record
Proposition 5 keeps the first part but eliminates your ability to vote for a replacement.
Every vetted record has a fingerprint that two keys signed and a timestamp authority stamped. The signed record, the keys and the receipts are in a public log, so you can check the signed copy there without relying on this site, and then check that this page shows that copy.
Vetted · Oct 3, 2026
Both keys signed this exact version, and it is in the public log.
Fingerprint
73f2385d32854a7781b8a48a62ec335bb1905e73991f6d7dcf3de60b85eaf7f9
A SHA-256 hash of the record as published. Changing one character changes it.
Signatures
Independently checked: signed by the site's service key, which only the publishing system holds.
Owner approved: signed with the owner's key, which the public log lists.
Technical details
- Service key id:
service:a3f979541aee7826- Owner key id:
SHA256:h82SrxLU1wYr+jpy4Vl9/9iQlAO+HQX1umVBdhy/Ss0- Owner keys file in the public log:
integrity/keys/owner.allowed_signers
Log entry
Entry 9, published Oct 3, 2026. Each entry includes the fingerprint of the one before it, so no earlier entry can change unnoticed.
Open entry 9 in the public repositoryMerkle proof
These hashes lead from this record's fingerprint to the entry's root: 510fa346bc644ee6942848357c92ed2869f227a8977c9bcc638184f371d8cee4
- 7be689bce4e10321423c5129af17e62d8e1d1101322d464edd15541929b3b213
- e5b00d1b2dd489f0db3ea8d1392b350461d7b327c720f5661db03ef74451847a
- a18ad540f287f7852c24156e45773281092971749c5e3f7c3059838b5b7f519b
- 960c9b81c51a19db7cde28ced99892d0fe792e5e8a62196ea088575c003d0df1
- 988db3f741fabb9b5b7bd799264edc106b7d65cd560a89c8513561e802c28773
- 479be4471e2c52151b9618ce6425133c25e630642d57ea7b76abc97c3b085d39
- 9b8ab8130fcfeac8d80c79834555c9c5576e160a7aaf347dc90223422cabe0fb
Outside witnesses
Versions
- Entry 9 · Oct 3, 2026 · current73f2385d32854a7781b8a48a62ec335bb1905e73991f6d7dcf3de60b85eaf7f9
- Entry 2 · Oct 3, 2026 · replaced on Oct 3, 2026d797c7560e5603cd43c2f419b3f67aa07273678197f2e7db358e9b194a684331
Judgments behind this record
Verdict on the claim
Call: Missing context
The Analyst confirms voters would no longer be asked who should replace a recalled official. For a state Senate or Assembly seat the replacement would typically be elected at a separate special election; for other offices other than Governor the Governor chooses the replacement; for the Governor the Lieutenant Governor serves, with a replacement elected at a future statewide election if the recall occurs early enough.
Made by a sourcer · checked by an independent checker · approved with the owner's key
Technical details
- Recorded call:
missing-context- Author id:
sourcer:ca-2026-measures- Checker id:
checker-judgments-ca-2026- Owner key id:
SHA256:h82SrxLU1wYr+jpy4Vl9/9iQlAO+HQX1umVBdhy/Ss0
Vetted · Oct 3, 2026
Check this judgment
Check it yourself
Copy the public log and run its script. It reads only the public log: the signed copy of this record, the judgments behind it, the keys and the receipts. It recomputes each fingerprint and checks the proof, both signatures and the timestamps. It checks the signed copy in the log, not the text on this page:
git clone https://github.com/Macpire/ideology-integrity-log
cd ideology-integrity-log
npx tsx integrity/verify-record.ts --log ca-2026 ca-prop-5-claim-2 --repo .To check that the text this site serves is that signed copy, add the site's address. Only this check ties the log to what you read here:
npx tsx integrity/verify-record.ts <site> ca-2026 ca-prop-5-claim-2 --repo .