Check this record
Amcha Yisrael, led by Ofer Winter: When a court rules that a law conflicts with a Basic Law, who should have the final say?
Every vetted record has a fingerprint that two keys signed and a timestamp authority stamped. The signed record, the keys and the receipts are in a public log, so you can check the signed copy there without relying on this site, and then check that this page shows that copy.
Vetted · Oct 4, 2026
Both keys signed this exact version, and it is in the public log.
Fingerprint
6aad7ce90cabf671519fcd4f694e542afd29f2748b1f42ecfaa22c30ab844480
A SHA-256 hash of the record as published. Changing one character changes it.
Signatures
Independently checked: signed by the site's service key, which only the publishing system holds.
Owner approved: signed with the owner's key, which the public log lists.
Technical details
- Service key id:
service:a3f979541aee7826- Owner key id:
SHA256:h82SrxLU1wYr+jpy4Vl9/9iQlAO+HQX1umVBdhy/Ss0- Owner keys file in the public log:
integrity/keys/owner.allowed_signers
Log entry
Entry 12, published Oct 4, 2026. Each entry includes the fingerprint of the one before it, so no earlier entry can change unnoticed.
Open entry 12 in the public repositoryMerkle proof
These hashes lead from this record's fingerprint to the entry's root: 8611291a8f306583e5fc4860a232b00fc25718ac52017fc1aa023b42a3c3833d
- 58ad8578b39f772a026ef07377a40b0904cfa45b2ddf75ae2a0b42d694a71727
- 29d72defb1607f79e3a0738e8518e6c9fed0c330a4fc0ff835040cd8d45c1508
- 8c2e8377edde3b356785be1b9e80d4c2cb581a49b20d38d543b12d0f03312a0b
- d34c2bb49fe2559e0d350f4d2c69c8ebbc5af5ade2b4f7fb367dc72560e5a57f
- 2fdb03b6043ea50b9f0607b079edfd8fc48616f736887b36851c56580639f6a1
Outside witnesses
Versions
- Entry 12 · Oct 4, 2026 · current6aad7ce90cabf671519fcd4f694e542afd29f2748b1f42ecfaa22c30ab844480
- Entry 10 · Oct 3, 2026 · replaced on Oct 4, 202603a635895d12ba75f617b946956f8768015935cb37f4e998a94c449dae1d12e3
Judgments behind this record
Side the statement takes
Call: No clear side, so it is not scored
An appellate court above the High Court would still be a court, but the document does not say who should have the final say when a court rules that a law conflicts with a higher law. It is shown and not scored.
Made by a sourcer · checked by an independent checker · approved with the owner's key
Technical details
- Recorded call:
believe.courts-final-say:none:false- Author id:
sourcer-questions-fix- Checker id:
checker-il-c4- Owner key id:
SHA256:h82SrxLU1wYr+jpy4Vl9/9iQlAO+HQX1umVBdhy/Ss0
Vetted · Oct 4, 2026
Check this judgment
Check it yourself
Copy the public log and run its script. It reads only the public log: the signed copy of this record, the judgments behind it, the keys and the receipts. It recomputes each fingerprint and checks the proof, both signatures and the timestamps. It checks the signed copy in the log, not the text on this page:
git clone https://github.com/Macpire/ideology-integrity-log
cd ideology-integrity-log
npx tsx integrity/verify-record.ts --log il-knesset-2026 il-amcha-yisrael-judicial-review --repo .To check that the text this site serves is that signed copy, add the site's address. Only this check ties the log to what you read here:
npx tsx integrity/verify-record.ts <site> il-knesset-2026 il-amcha-yisrael-judicial-review --repo .