Ideology
Sign inRegister

Check this record

Beyachad (Together), led by Naftali Bennett: Should Israel have civil marriage?

Every vetted record has a fingerprint that two keys signed and a timestamp authority stamped. The signed record, the keys and the receipts are in a public log, so you can check the signed copy there without relying on this site, and then check that this page shows that copy.

Vetted · Oct 3, 2026

Both keys signed this exact version, and it is in the public log.

Fingerprint

326453741958c1017f2b09a735a4a70e0e6356bc7316e917b7a25c6a5025ea38

A SHA-256 hash of the record as published. Changing one character changes it.

Signatures

Independently checked: signed by the site's service key, which only the publishing system holds.

Owner approved: signed with the owner's key, which the public log lists.

Technical details
Service key id:
service:a3f979541aee7826
Owner key id:
SHA256:h82SrxLU1wYr+jpy4Vl9/9iQlAO+HQX1umVBdhy/Ss0
Owner keys file in the public log:
integrity/keys/owner.allowed_signers

Log entry

Entry 3, published Oct 3, 2026. Each entry includes the fingerprint of the one before it, so no earlier entry can change unnoticed.

Open entry 3 in the public repository
Merkle proof

These hashes lead from this record's fingerprint to the entry's root: bf7f9646337e9305f12303f18c3adac264a8672519838db430261e378db540ba

  1. 393bbe88252b774758220a0762d9d02218e7ce63a7a7331305366bb4f87e901f
  2. 04e11c22a002ae99d39021eff362c59b49417926fab04b3d989ee73466d5c95e
  3. 7da7fd64e063fd766df7e130bf49c39cb0e271352df1cca6789c4a8cff70acd6
  4. a9d47352edd82d61164886d804154a7b2c18d1ce32c82f0205b878acc358ea36
  5. 699467aa5e581437553d13902f9de1ee9d0ef02ba91967c2ed02348f1d99b4ae
  6. 2e9fe11f04eb3629543acee6c3cf895ff547c513aaa10b976a759e851578c819

Outside witnesses

  • Timestamp authority (RFC 3161)TimestampedReceipt
  • OpenTimestamps (Bitcoin)Bitcoin timestamp pendingReceipt

Versions

  1. Entry 3 · Oct 3, 2026 · current
    326453741958c1017f2b09a735a4a70e0e6356bc7316e917b7a25c6a5025ea38

Judgments behind this record

  • Side the statement takes

    Call: Side B, “Allow civil marriage”

    The plan proposes a “civil union” rather than civil marriage by that name, and says the Chief Rabbinate stays but loses its exclusivity.

    Made by a sourcer · checked by an independent checker · approved with the owner's key

    Technical details
    Recorded call:
    il-knesset-2026.want.civil-marriage:b:true
    Author id:
    sourcer-questions-il
    Checker id:
    checker-il-c4
    Owner key id:
    SHA256:h82SrxLU1wYr+jpy4Vl9/9iQlAO+HQX1umVBdhy/Ss0

    Vetted · Oct 4, 2026

    Check this judgment

Check it yourself

Copy the public log and run its script. It reads only the public log: the signed copy of this record, the judgments behind it, the keys and the receipts. It recomputes each fingerprint and checks the proof, both signatures and the timestamps. It checks the signed copy in the log, not the text on this page:

git clone https://github.com/Macpire/ideology-integrity-log
cd ideology-integrity-log
npx tsx integrity/verify-record.ts --log il-knesset-2026 il-beyachad-religion-state --repo .

To check that the text this site serves is that signed copy, add the site's address. Only this check ties the log to what you read here:

npx tsx integrity/verify-record.ts <site> il-knesset-2026 il-beyachad-religion-state --repo .
How fingerprints are computedThe record and its proof as dataHow records are checked and signed

Before you begin

Please read this notice. By selecting “I understand and agree” you confirm that you have read it and accept it, together with the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy.

  1. An independent experiment

    Ideology is an independent, experimental, non-commercial project, offered for information and education only. It may change, contain errors, or be withdrawn at any time without notice.

  2. No political affiliation

    The site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, funded by, or acting on behalf of any political party, candidate, campaign, list, government body, or interest group. Nothing on it is a recommendation on how to vote, nor support for or opposition to any party, candidate, or position.

  3. Prepared with artificial intelligence

    Content on the site, including summaries, translations, classifications, comparisons, verdicts, and match results, is gathered, processed, or generated in whole or in part with artificial intelligence (AI) tools. AI output may be inaccurate, incomplete, outdated, or biased. It is not verified fact and not professional, legal, or political advice. Always check the linked original sources.

  4. Your use, your responsibility

    You use the site at your own discretion and risk. It is provided “as is” and “as available”, without warranties of any kind, express or implied. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator is not liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential loss arising from use of, or reliance on, the site or its content. Any decision you make, including how to vote, is yours alone.

Full details: Terms · Privacy