Ideology

Check this record

Yisrael Beytenu, led by Avigdor Liberman: When a court rules that a law conflicts with a Basic Law, who should have the final say?

Every vetted record has a fingerprint that two keys signed and a timestamp authority stamped. The signed record, the keys and the receipts are in a public log, so you can check the signed copy there without relying on this site, and then check that this page shows that copy.

Vetted · Oct 3, 2026

Both keys signed this exact version, and it is in the public log.

Fingerprint

6433d10b362e0c244882fbf95b93aa0da35a6be9dec32aeb473e4cb4eab68d6c

A SHA-256 hash of the record as published. Changing one character changes it.

Signatures

Independently checked: signed by the site's service key, which only the publishing system holds.

Owner approved: signed with the owner's key, which the public log lists.

Technical details
Service key id:
service:a3f979541aee7826
Owner key id:
SHA256:h82SrxLU1wYr+jpy4Vl9/9iQlAO+HQX1umVBdhy/Ss0
Owner keys file in the public log:
integrity/keys/owner.allowed_signers

Log entry

Entry 10, published Oct 3, 2026. Each entry includes the fingerprint of the one before it, so no earlier entry can change unnoticed.

Open entry 10 in the public repository
Merkle proof

These hashes lead from this record's fingerprint to the entry's root: 32793ffe489909301a64220c08e076feab90a9d8a1a5921dc477924294ee4ae6

  1. 5f074e7d1a519af213268cbef6f292008f7b28494a3653c318d02adfcc1b35f5
  2. 18aaf3b1f2bac6d73a9fe6765bf8ab5aeefe02ec6f0ff501d40e410970bda9da
  3. f9f889813a362dfb58522056d8a3d872ab40377b14cc9a38b528ae96326b6e2b
  4. 3fe72ef871912e8f7f359905e3760220a9780e472007997c85e629eab48d73dd
  5. 4bcd1e7c55fd2cebdf156874b6acd9f00c9f26170936d2e4661dea1b5a21ba5a

Outside witnesses

  • Timestamp authority (RFC 3161)TimestampedReceipt
  • OpenTimestamps (Bitcoin)Bitcoin timestamp pendingReceipt

Versions

  1. Entry 10 · Oct 3, 2026 · current
    6433d10b362e0c244882fbf95b93aa0da35a6be9dec32aeb473e4cb4eab68d6c

Judgments behind this record

  • Side the statement takes

    Call: Side A, “The court, and the law does not stay in force”

    The same section proposes a constitution and a constitutional court, so review of laws would move to that new court.

    Made by a sourcer · checked by an independent checker · approved with the owner's key

    Technical details
    Recorded call:
    believe.courts-final-say:a:true
    Author id:
    sourcer-questions-fix
    Checker id:
    checker-il-c4
    Owner key id:
    SHA256:h82SrxLU1wYr+jpy4Vl9/9iQlAO+HQX1umVBdhy/Ss0

    Vetted · Oct 4, 2026

    Check this judgment

Check it yourself

Copy the public log and run its script. It reads only the public log: the signed copy of this record, the judgments behind it, the keys and the receipts. It recomputes each fingerprint and checks the proof, both signatures and the timestamps. It checks the signed copy in the log, not the text on this page:

git clone https://github.com/Macpire/ideology-integrity-log
cd ideology-integrity-log
npx tsx integrity/verify-record.ts --log il-knesset-2026 il-yisrael-beytenu-judicial-review --repo .

To check that the text this site serves is that signed copy, add the site's address. Only this check ties the log to what you read here:

npx tsx integrity/verify-record.ts <site> il-knesset-2026 il-yisrael-beytenu-judicial-review --repo .

Before you begin

Please read this notice. By selecting “I understand and agree” you confirm that you have read it and accept it, together with the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy.

  1. An independent experiment

    Ideology is an independent, experimental, non-commercial project, offered for information and education only. It may change, contain errors, or be withdrawn at any time without notice.

  2. No political affiliation

    The site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, funded by, or acting on behalf of any political party, candidate, campaign, list, government body, or interest group. Nothing on it is a recommendation on how to vote, nor support for or opposition to any party, candidate, or position.

  3. Prepared with artificial intelligence

    Content on the site, including summaries, translations, classifications, comparisons, verdicts, and match results, is gathered, processed, or generated in whole or in part with artificial intelligence (AI) tools. AI output may be inaccurate, incomplete, outdated, or biased. It is not verified fact and not professional, legal, or political advice. Always check the linked original sources.

  4. Your use, your responsibility

    You use the site at your own discretion and risk. It is provided “as is” and “as available”, without warranties of any kind, express or implied. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator is not liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential loss arising from use of, or reliance on, the site or its content. Any decision you make, including how to vote, is yours alone.

Full details: Terms · Privacy